Monday, 18 April 2016

Prophet of Islam ordered the apostates to be killed

Islamic State produces a glossy magazine called 'Dabiq'. One can read all the issues on the web-link below.

Read the latest issue of 'Dabiq' magazine on the following web-link.

Reading 'Dabiq' can be a very good education in what Islam really is. Indians must read it.

Read the article, 'Kill the Imams of Kufr in the West' on page 8 of the latest issue.

It explains how the Prophet of Islam treated those whom he considered to have committed Riddah (apostasy). He ordered them to be killed.

"During the life and mission of the Prophet, the issue of Riddah arose on a few occasions.

The most famous case was that of the ‘Uklī–‘Uranī apostates. Some men from the tribes of ‘Ukl and ‘Uraynah came to al-Madīnah, entered upon the Prophet and announced their Islam. They then said to him, “O Prophet of Allah! We are a people of livestock.......

(After they apostatised...)

The news reached the Prophet, so he sent trackers to find them.

After they were found, he ordered that their eyes be gouged out with iron nails, their hands and feet be cut off, and they be left atop the volcanic rock field begging for water, which they would not be given, until they died in that condition (Reported by al-Bukhārī and Muslim
from Anas Ibn Mālik)."

The following is another case of how the Prophet of Islam dealt with an apostate.

"Another case in that blessed time was that of Ibn Khatal.

When Allah’s Messenger entered Makkah during its conquest, a man came to him and informed him that Ibn Khatal was clinging to the drapery covering the Ka’bah (a gesture symbolizing his seeking amnesty from the Muslims by appealing to their reverence of the Haram).

So he said, “Kill him” [Reported by al-Bukhārī and Muslim from Anas Ibn Mālik]."

Dabiq magazine has quite a lot to say about the “Hindus” – the adherents of "this filthy, cow-worshiping religion".

(Just go into the PDF of the latest issue and press Control + F. Then type HINDU + Enter to find all references to Hindus.)

The following are two extracts of Dabiq's interview with the Amir of the Khilafah's soldiers in Bengal Shaykh Abu Ibrahim Al-Hanif.

(Islamic State refers to itself as Khilafah or Caliphate which is how Prophet established Islam. So Islam has always been a 'state'.)

The two extracts of the interview are particularly relevant to Bengal. Please send them to Mamata Banerjee if you have her email ID.

DĀBIQ: Can you explain the importance of Bengal to the Khilāfah and its jihād globally?

ABŪ IBRĀHĪM: Bengal is an important region for the Khilāfah and the global jihād due to
its strategic geographic position.

Bengal is located on the eastern side of India, whereas Wilāyat Khurāsān is located on its western side.

Thus, having a strong jihād base in Bengal will facilitate performing guerilla attacks inside India simultaneously from both sides and facilitate creating a condition of tawahhush in India along with the help of the existing local mujāhidīn there, bi idnillāh, until the soldiers of the Khilāfah are able to enter with a conventional army and completely liberate the region from the mushrikīn, after first getting rid of the “Pakistani” and “Afghani” regimes, inshā’allāh.

Also, jihād in Bengal is a stepping-stone for jihād in Burma as already mentioned.

My gloss: 'Mushrikin' refers to non-Muslims or non believers. The root of this Arabic word is 'shirk' which means mixing or inclusion – such as inclusive veneration for various gods rather than one God.

'Shirk' is synonymous with what is termed in Abrahamic theology as "syncretism" - which means living side by side with those who have beliefs or ideas different from you.

'Syncretism' is the soul of human cultures across the world. There cannot be any human culture without 'syncretism'.

And yet Judeo-Christianity and Islam completely reject and curse 'Shirk' or 'syncretism'.

The whole Abrahamic system anathematizes  'syncretism'.

Do go to the Vatican website and search the word 'syncretism' to understand how Christianity views 'syncretism.

Judeo-Christianity and Islam thus pose themselves as enemies of all cultures across the world.

Abrahamic system, in my opinion, is the most lethal ethnocidal force in the world.

Etymologically, 'ethnocide' is ethno (culture) + cide (kill) – i.e. killing of culture.

DABIQ: What is the role of India and the Hindus in the war against Islam and the Khilāfah in general, and in Bengal in particular?

ABŪ IBRĀHĪM: The Hindus of both Bengal and India have always been waging war against Islam and the Muslims.

The only difference is that the Hindus in India show their animosity towards Islam and the Muslims openly whereas the Hindus in Bengal do it in a more deceptive and covert manner due to them being a minority sect here.

The Hindus in Bengal are very active in creating anti-Islamic propaganda in both mass media and social media, and in spreading fāhishah among the Muslims of Bengal.

In fact, a large number of the anti-Islamic propagandists in Bengal actually adhered to this filthy, cow-worshiping religion initially before becoming full-fledged atheists and denying “religion” entirely.

Also, many of the high-ranking positions within the forces of the tāghūt in the police and intelligence in Bengal are now occupied by the Hindus, as the murtadd, secular Hasina government sees these filthy pagans as die-hard party loyalists.

Furthermore, the Hindus in Bengal are well-known for supporting Indian intelligence (RAW) against the Muslims in Bengal since the days of the so-called “Bangladesh Liberation War” in “1971.”

Thus, we believe Sharī’ah in Bengal won’t be achieved until the local Hindus are targeted in mass numbers and until a state of polarization is created in the region, dividing between the believers and the disbelievers, bi idhnillāh. And Allah knows best.

'Hinduism' the 'religion' does not exist. 'Religion' is an abusive concept.

In the following article headlined 'Why The Terminological Terrorism Of ‘Left Liberals’ Needs To Be Debunked,' R. Jagannathan talks of 'Hinduism' and describes it as a 'religion'.

"All religions have their priests and ideologues; in Hinduism it was Brahmins," he writes.
Having described 'Hinduism' as a 'religion', Jagannathan then places, by analogy, this so called 'Hinduism' in the same category as Christianity and Islam.
He writes: "Didn’t Christianity and Islam not have their priests and ulema, their own rabid guardians of the faith...?"

The article was published on 14 April 2016 on Swarajya magazine website. It can be read on the following link.

I think, Jagannathan is on the wrong track. I posted the following comment in response to what I believe are the wrong assumptions and analogies in his article.

Dear Jagannathan, you are fighting a losing battle. You lost it even before you started it by accepting all the fraudulent concepts of the West.

You accept, for instance, that there is a thing called Hinduism, the 'religion', just like Christianity and Islam. So you assume that the so called Hinduism is equivalent to Christianity and Islam. And then you go on to argue, quite slavishly like a Westerner, more instances of phony equivalence between Hinduism on the one hand and Christianity/Islam on the other.

The fraudsters of the 'Abrahamic' faiths would be sniggering at your disastrously self-defeating reasoning.

The fact of the matter is that there is no such thing as Hinduism the religion.

'Religion' is an utterly abusive, colonial and imperial concept that applies only and only to Judeo-christianity and Islam, i.e. the Abrahamic system.

'Religion' can -- and should -- never be applied to any human culture across the world (Indic or non-Indic) through history.

India, through history, has always had 'cultures' - which are open systems, unlike 'religion' which is a closed system.

In fact, all human cultures -- not just in India but across the world -- are open systems.

No human culture can ever exist in a healthful manner and evolve without openness. This openness does not need defining.

However, just to show an important distinction we are discussing here, let me say that this openness can be denoted by the term 'syncretism'.

'Syncretism' is the DNA - the meme - of every human culture across the world and through history.

But 'syncretism' is execrated and anathematized by 'religion', i.e. by Judeo-christianity and Islam.

Just check the Vatican website and search for the word 'syncretism' to understand how Christianity rejects 'syncretism'.

Islam uses the Arabic word 'shirk' for 'syncretism' and anathematizes it.

So the concept of 'syncretism' explains the key difference between 'culture' on the one hand and 'religion' on the other.

Culture is open source.

Religion is closed source.

By anathematizing 'syncretism', 'religion' -- i.e. Judeo-christianity and Islam -- acts as an ethnocidal force in the world.

And 'religion' mislabels and mischaracterizes human cultures across the world as one of its own category --- such as "Hinduism", "Buddhism", "Shamanism", etc.

A commentator called PV contradicted me by posting the following.

"Dear Kapil...When the legions of Islamo and Jesu come trumpeting with their organized "religion" force, there are audience who remain on the side, like you, lecturing and advocating pompous phrases like "...there is no such thing as Hinduism, the religion".

Somehow, the opposite side, does not understand anything other than the word "religion". So, they have to be dealt in the same way. Meanwhile, please do not be friendly to those gangs. 

Coining the word "religion" in the context of Hinduism does not rob 0.00000001% of the "cultural" side of it. And, when you say every culture has been open, I sense that your mental state is nor right. Do not lecture openness to Hindus."  

The following is my rejoinder to PV.

Nothing that you write in your affectedly brash tone is going to make "Hinduism" even 0.00000001% more "organized" or "religion".

And allowing the Abrahamic education and propaganda system - which creates the mass confusion between open 'culture' and closed 'religion' - to continue will continue to undermine what we already have, let alone help us gain anything.

The so called "Hindus" are already "converted" -- wiped out -- if they consider themselves followers of some "religion". Missionaries don't have to lift a finger.

I suspect a fast growing majority of people across the world -- including those who get called "Hindu" or pagan/heathen -- are already "converted".

This idea of yours that the so called Hindus can resist the legions of Islam and Christianity by adopting their fraudulent concepts is so obviously stupid and self defeating that I wonder if you can really think for yourself.

The whole "battle" is about resisting the acceptance of certain fraudulent concepts and resisting viewing oneself through the prism of those concepts.

The physical battle only flows from the larger conceptual and perceptual battle.

The whole world is actually by its very nature Hindu or pagan. That's the truth. The Abrahamic system has been trying madly to make it behave in certain fundamental ways like it can never behave.

And therefore the so called "Hindus" need to lead a worldwide movement of showing the falsity and imperialism of the Abrahamic system and the 'syncretism' of human cultures.

I don't like buzz words, but one can call it 're-paganization' of the world (even though I believe the world has always been pagan despite the mislabelling and mischaracterization practised by the Abrahamic system.)

Yes, every human culture has 'sycretism' as its meme. 

In fact, Christian and Muslim societies can also not run without accepting syncretism, even though they profess complete rejection of syncretism in order to justify their own existence.

You need to spend your time reflecting and understanding some basic concepts.

Without some elementary wisdom, we are all dead and buried.

Here’s how Sonia, Manmohan, Modi, Left and others sold out India to Bill Gates and other globalist criminals and are conspiring to enslave 135 crore Indians to a totalitarian world government

By Kapil Bajaj Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust (RGCT), which is chaired by Congress president Sonia Gandhi and has her son Rahul Gandhi as a t...